Mike Farrel:
The first comment i posted on mike's blog was to his gallery visit. Out of all the pieces we only chose one the same-Indefinite Divisibility 1942 by Yves Tanguy. I agreed with him that the piece was very interesting and how there was no limits. I think he chose this one as one of three that impacted/impressed him, whereas I chose it as one I would like to learn more about.
The second comment I posted was about project one. I did agree with his choices of pictures to match the elements and principles. I also saw how some could have more than one. The one I liked the most was of his dog, i would have never thought of choosing texture, i probably would have chose emphasis for that picture.  http://farrelmr01.blogspot.com/
Tracy- anne King:
The first comment i posted on tracy's blog was her art gallery visit, which i really enjoyed. She did her project at a gallery in NYC and i did my at the Albright Knox, so obviously we wouldnt have chose the same pieces. I did look at the pictures and then read the descriptions, and I would have agreed with alot of her reasonings, especially the walking stick.
The second comment i posted on her blog was to her project 1. I agreed with all of her choices, though i thought most i would have picked different elements or principles. i thought the chair or stool thing was a very different choice for line, it worked, but i never would have thought of that.
http://adventuresinart-tracy-anne.blogspot.com/
I think that reading other people's blogs open my eyes to more interpretations that i would never have seen on my own. I also thought that the comments were useful, they gave more explanations for some things i wouldnt think of such as, the canoe sculpture.